...the new site is shaping up. As I promised before, we've implemented a number of changes to the new site and I honestly think they are for the better. But before I talk about the new changes, let me talk about where the idea for the new site came from:

We had some pretty big meetings here at AT a couple weeks back and one thing to discuss was the site layout and what we felt it needed.

One thing we noticed when looking at the old site was that although we were displaying tons of articles on the front page, very few people scrolled down and clicked on the last review being displayed on the front page. In fact, after a review had gone below the 3rd position on the front page it hardly received any attention.

The next thing we noticed was that once an article fell off of the front page, it was very difficult to get to. You either had to go to the section that the article was located in (e.g. CPUs) and hope it was still on that front page, or try and remember the name of the article to search for it.

So what we had was a site layout that was great for daily readers, and great for finding fairly recent articles if you wanted to find anything else you were left with the search engine and that's all. This is where the AnandTech Product Coverage section was born from, and we kept it at the bottom half of the page so that the focus would still be on the latest reviews.

Then we thought that we wanted people to use the Product Coverage section so we tried to keep it at least somewhat visible by compressing the latest reviews area of the site. We ended up making a mistake here in that we were too aggressive in cutting the number of reviews listed with images/descriptions down to 2. We relied a bit too much on the text links to the right to make up for it, and have since reversed a bit of the decision. Now we display 5 articles to the left, and still display 8 to the right, so we're actually displaying more content on the front page and it's done in an even smaller area than with the old site - but I think it works now that we've tweaked it a bit.

The next thing was that we wanted to make room for what we finally decided to call AnandTech Insider stories. These articles are quick little 1 - 2 pagers that are usually verbally confirmed rumors, etc... that we get from our sources on products and technology that haven't been officially launched yet. The problem with these stories was that we would sometimes have 3 of them in a week, meaning that they would push the reviews far down the page, cannibalizing the attention those reviews got. Our solution was to separate them into a section of their own, and since we've added dates to the review/story titles now you should have a better idea of what's new and what's not.

Another huge motivation for us was page size; even on broadband the old site would take a bit longer to load than I liked, but now the thing just flies. We have pulled the news off of the front page, but the headlines are still there and you can go directly to the news page if you'd like to see a listing of all of the news in an easy to scroll-thru fashion.

The added color and tweaked graphics were just things to complete the package and everyone is entitled to their own opinions about them. We've tweaked the graphics a bit in response to reader comments (as well as the rest of the design which should be evident by now) and I think they look even better now.

When we launched it I liked the new site better than the old one, but with your comments I'm now loving it a lot more. We are still tweaking a bit but I think we've nailed the major things. Jason (the man responsible for the code behind the new design) and I both take every single comment to heart (as positive or as harsh as it may be) which is something I hope is quite evident by the quick turnaround on the design changes that you've seen here.

A big internal motivation for the new design was to move to a much improved web architecture, something that Jason will be talking about in greater detail in a Behind AnandTech article. AnandTech (the main site at least) is now running on a Microsoft .NET platform and the site is faster than ever. Although the site may look familiar, the entire web architecture has been re-done and re-written and it's pretty impressive if I do say so myself. We haven't scheduled Jason's article about the site's architecture yet, but I'll be sure to let you all know when I have a better idea of when it'll go live.

That's about it for now, I'm working on the Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 (400GB) review which is currently scheduled to go up on Saturday. So far everything's going well so you should expect that review this weekend.

Take care :)
Comments Locked

111 Comments

View All Comments

  • Adam K. - Saturday, July 24, 2004 - link

    Give me a break; I am still allowed to complain a bit, aren't I? Don't take everything so seriously, Krishna!
  • Krishna - Saturday, July 24, 2004 - link

    Isn't Anand getting married soon? Give him a break with the blog updates - I'm sure he's got his hands full gearing up for his wedding. He'll get back to posting new stuff when he's ready.
  • Adam K. - Saturday, July 24, 2004 - link

    Hey Anand!

    No more blogs?

    (:
  • Anonymous - Friday, July 23, 2004 - link

    Since you are out of school, I expected many more reviews from you, but how come you only do 1 review per week. I understand that you have to manage AnandTech and all the editors, but at least 3 reviews per week should be good enough.

    I hope you don't turn into Tom Pabst (TomsHardware) where all the editors do all the work and you just manage the business side of things.

    I am guessing that you must be planning to expand AnandTech is a lot of ways, but it would great if you can please continue with your blog. :-)
  • Anonymous - Friday, July 23, 2004 - link

    Time for a new blogaroo...been almost 2.5 weeks...what's up with saying we'll hear from you more when you graduated? Is it that you just have some uber-secret stuff that you're afraid you'll drop when you blog or somethin? (-:
  • James - Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - link

    #93, So it is. I'm an idiot :). But I guess I never saw an explanation/answer, so the question is still applicable. Thanks!

    James
  • Jason Clark - Wednesday, July 21, 2004 - link

    #89, The page is a heck of alot smaller than what it used to be, we went from 130K to 40K of html. The only thing that would take time now is ads, and I can't help with that problem :) This site loads at least twice as fast as the old site, and i have benchmarks going up soon in an article we're doing on our transition from our old site to new site.

    Cheers.
  • Anonymous - Tuesday, July 20, 2004 - link

    James - I think someone has already posted about this. :-)
  • James - Tuesday, July 20, 2004 - link

    If anyone is still reading these, I've noticed an odd problem with the front page. The little blurbs below the titles sometimes cut off in the middle of a sentence. I could understand this if they were just copied from the first sentence of the article, but that doesn't seem to be the case. It seems that they are written specifically for the front page, but then cut off? I still don't like the design very much, but you do have the best articles. I'm a big fan of the ve3d.com-style layout. Just give me the articles in a big list. Thanks!
  • Anonymous - Tuesday, July 20, 2004 - link

    I think it's time for another blog post.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now